The main discriminating legitimate interview to judge, within the right of expression, is the public interest in the opinions or statements of the interviewee.
E 'useful here to define a bit' better the concept of public interest, not just the mere curiosity of the public to ensure that an event is received to the public interest, but it is necessary that it contributes to the formation of a ' public good.
addition to the interview must contain profiles of public information, which go beyond the subjective position of the interviewee.
The reputation of the respondent is in any case in a discriminating assessment of the public of the fact, but less important than the actual interest of what he said.
Having said that differences remain on the responsibility of the interviewer and the interviewee's responsibility.
The discriminant for assessing the mere exercise or not, the freedom of the press, by the interviewee, is the actual degree of public importance of the event / statement by verifying that the journalist has merely to report the 'event, rather than transforming it into an instrument of defamation.
The discriminant to assess the veracity of the statements by the interviewee meets to evaluate the discriminatory exercise of freedom of the press.