Since the right to criticize, which is one aspect of the manifestation of thought protected by Article 21 of the Constitution - is realized to express an opinion and interpretation which, by definition, can not be strictly objective.
Given that criticism, by its nature, tends to put a bad light on who is the subject
Given that the journalist is not a judge, but a person who can assess the facts in the light of its social and political inclinations.
The Court focused its attention on identifying the parameters by which the interpretation of an event to coincide with the exercise of the right to criticize precisely.
Here's how it was interpreted and defined the concept of truth in the law of critical
first prerequisite of the right of criticism is the truth that has created the same.
As for the mere exercise of criticism, it must respect the limit of continence expression, which will be assessed with reference to the historical context in which social and cultural criticism has been exercised.
also must not exceed the limit of respect for the person, not to interfere in the private sphere, in the moral property of the individual concerned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment